If we consider the facts that Grant had no intention to stamp on Phil’s foot but mistakenly Phil did thought it was intentional, Phil would have to prove that Grant had committed an unlawful act and that act caused damage to Phil which he had suffered. Several torts require intention on the position of the defendant. The most noticeable examples are the torts of assault and battery. In these terms it requires the intention to be deliberate in the defendant’s actions. We can assume that Grant negligently stamped on Phil’s foot and as the state of mind negligence can be committed with carelessness.
Read more on Act Law Imprison here...
Showing posts with label Act Law Imprison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Act Law Imprison. Show all posts
21 Mar 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)